The established foundation

Safety engineering grounded in real development programs.

Practical support from early concepts and safety planning through detailed analysis, verification and certification-ready evidence.

Delivered to customers: Safety for Dynamic Development Teams - a phased route from a focused gap analysis and immediate quick wins to a scalable safety process, compliant work products and long-term internal capability.

Our way of working

Safety for Dynamic Development Teams

Traditional safety approaches often assume mature organizations, stable architectures and established development processes. Fast-moving teams need to make safety decisions earlier.

We use optimized safety processes for startups, scale-ups, innovation units and new programs inside established organizations. Analyses can begin conservatively and gain detail as architecture, data and evidence mature.

  1. 01Start conservatively

    Use explicit worst-case assumptions where system detail is still missing.

  2. 02Transfer critical information

    Bring safety-relevant findings rapidly to architecture and development teams.

  3. 03Make focused decisions

    Resolve the safety questions that matter for the next development milestone.

  4. 04Refine the analyses

    Enrich models and revisit assumptions as architecture and data mature.

  5. 05Build mature evidence

    Maintain consistent analyses, traceability and reviewable safety arguments.

Start with conservative assumptions. Increase analysis depth as knowledge and evidence grow.

Assumptions remain explicit and reviewable. Each phase has defined inputs, outputs and review points, so teams can act on safety-critical information without waiting for every detail to be settled.

Delivered to customers: safety management and planning, hazard and risk analysis, functional and technical safety concepts, requirements, architecture, FTA, FMEA, FMEDA, verification, safety cases, gap analysis and practical capability building.

Ways to engage

Start at the level the program needs.

The scope can be a focused decision, a defined engineering delivery or integrated support across the lifecycle.

Engineering in practice

From architecture to measurable evidence.

Safety decisions are developed alongside the real product architecture, interfaces, failure behaviour and verification strategy.

Safety engineer reviewing an electric vehicle system architecture
Architecture, analysis and verification remain connected throughout development.
Core services

Build safety into the engineering work.

We support complete programs or focused work packages, working alongside engineering teams, suppliers and management.

Plan and manage

  • Safety management and Safety Plan
  • Development Interface Agreements
  • Supplier coordination
  • Assessment preparation

Analyze and define

  • Hazard analysis and risk assessment
  • Safety Goals
  • Functional Safety Concept and Functional Safety Requirements (FSC / FSR)
  • Technical Safety Concept and Technical Safety Requirements (TSC / TSR)
  • System, hardware and software safety requirements (HW / SW)
  • Safety architecture and design

Verify and demonstrate

  • FTA, FMEA and FMEDA
  • Verification, validation and test strategy
  • Safety cases
  • Certification-ready documentation

Improve the organization

  • Gap analysis and practical quick wins
  • Process analysis and improvement
  • Change and requirements management
  • Tool and environment evaluation

Develop capability

  • Role-based training
  • Coaching inside live programs
  • Review preparation
  • Lessons from real projects

Work across the lifecycle

From concept and architecture through detailed development, integration, evidence and assessment readiness.

Frameworks

Standards translated into engineering decisions.

Our work draws on the relevant framework and product context without reducing safety to a checklist.

ISO 26262 ISO 21448 IEC 61508 ISO 14971 IEC 60601 IEC 62304 EU MDR FDA expectations

Support, not certification authority

FuSaExperts prepares engineering work products, evidence and organizations for reviews, regulatory submissions and assessments. The responsible approval and certification bodies retain their formal roles.

Sectors

Cross-sector experience, context-specific execution.

The safety principles connect. The hazards, architectures, lifecycle constraints and regulatory expectations differ.

Automotive

ADAS and automated driving, electric powertrains, high-voltage systems, vehicle dynamics and control systems.

Medical devices

Risk management, essential performance, single-fault safety, software safety and regulatory documentation.

Railway

Integrity-critical system development, safety management, concepts and structured assurance evidence.

Industrial systems

Functional safety for machinery, control and process environments with practical organizational integration.

Need focused support or a complete work package?

We work with large organizations and agile start-ups, adapting to the maturity and pace of the program.

Discuss your program