Safe AI Lab / Robotics & Physical AI Safety

Understanding consequences beyond the immediate robot action.

Collision avoidance is essential, but physical safety also depends on support, load, stability, connectivity and stored energy across the wider scene.

Customers benefit from: simulation of hazardous physical interactions, development of safety envelopes and runtime monitors, analysis of indirect and cascading consequences, and structured evidence for requirements and safety cases.

Physical safety research scenarios

Robot and person with a monitored stopping envelope
01 / Interaction

Separation is dynamic.

Assess human/robot distance together with closing speed, reaction time, braking behavior and the stopping envelope.

Removal of a support under stacked objects creates a stability hazard
02 / Physical consequences

One action can change the whole scene.

Investigate support relationships, load paths, stability and cascading effects when objects are moved or removed.

Hazardous-energy boundary and maintenance interface
03 / Hazardous energy

Safety extends beyond contact.

Examine stored energy, high-voltage clearances, cable loading and isolation during collaborative maintenance.

Mobile robot on a slope with payload and centre-of-mass indicators
04 / Mobile systems

Terrain changes the safety margin.

Vary payload, centre of mass, friction and braking demand to investigate stability and motion on slopes.

Part of our Safe AI Lab ↗

A safe distance does not make every action safe.

A robot may avoid direct contact with a person and still create danger by removing structural support, shifting a load, releasing tension, destabilizing stacked objects or triggering a cascading event.

Engineering and research collaboration

Customers can commission focused simulation and safety-concept activities. The wider capability for physical consequence awareness remains active research and is not presented as a finished autonomy product.

Physical AI Safety research

Scene understanding, support and contact relationships, stability, load paths, connectivity and cascading physical effects.

Safety concept development

Runtime monitors, safety envelopes, guardrails, safe-action selection and fallback strategies.

Simulation-based safety assurance

Hazardous scenarios, fault injection and evidence for verification, safety requirements and safety cases.

Reasoning chain

From perception to consequence envelope.

The sequence makes the required reasoning explicit and therefore easier to test.

Perceive the complex scene
Map support, contact, load and connectivity
Predict indirect and cascading effects
Check the consequence envelope
Simulation cases

Simple scenes can expose complex hazards.

Each case can vary geometry, friction, mass, contact, motion and human proximity to build structured evidence.

Remove from a stack

An object appears free to grasp but supports an unstable load above it.

Move on a slope

A payload shift changes the centre of mass, braking demand or rollover margin.

Release stored energy

Manipulating a connected part releases tension, pressure or elastic energy outside the immediate workspace.

Operate near high voltage

Motion changes clearances, cable loading or access to energized equipment.

Transfer or assist a person

Support, posture, contact force and fallback behaviour interact throughout the action.

Shift a shared support

Moving one object changes the stability of connected or resting objects elsewhere.

Collaborate on Physical AI safety.

We welcome focused research, simulation and safety concept activities with robotics developers and technology partners.

Discuss a collaboration